Видео

Cannon Film

Numsie brother nice to have there is no ground here 😊😊😊

House for this movie is in a sleepy North Carolina town called Southport

Bring back calling movies "pictures"!

Ebert turned into a reptilian right before are eyes.

I look at this movie as a dry run for Twin Peaks. In TP Lynch was constrained by network television, and he still managed to break television. I think every insane and weird TV show that came after - The Sopranos, Breaking Bad, Better Call Saul... they all owe Lynch for breaking television, and those later shows on cable didn't have the same constraints. And Lynch comes back and does a 25 years later reprisal of Twin Peaks which breaks television again. The Return (2017) is unquestionably the weirdest TV of all. The second weirdest - The O.A. - was scrapped by Netflix after two seasons and it still managed to ascend that Lynch ladder. It's a pity that The O.A. will never be finished. Lynch got the chance to finish TP, and maybe maybe someday Marling and Batmanglij will get the chance to finish The O.A. even if it is 25 years later.

Ebert is a critic for dummies. No one should ever watch movies based on his suggestions. What a shallow man. Completely clueless of what the film was even about. Just picking on the violence and nudities. Suddenly “cares” so much about Isabella Roselini’s nudity scenes.

Worst review of Blue Velvet I have ever witnessed.

They keep comparing the play to the movie and that’s their mistake right there. The movie was good, they were wrong. That’s all there is.

ebert is based

There wasn't a gay bar was there??? Murders??

Ellen Greene performed the musical on stage. She was brought in to advise on the movie and somebody asked the obvious. "Why don't we just use HER?"

I like Ebert but he’s off the mark here. Isabella herself refuted his opinion: “I didn’t read the reviews at the time [‘Blue Velvet’] came out. I try not to read reviews,” Rossellini recently told IndieWire when asked about Ebert’s infamous pan. “They’re always depressing. There’s always something that, even if [the review is] good, there is always one sentence that is negative and stays inside you forever. But I remember I was told that Roger Ebert said that [Lynch] exploited me, and I was surprised, because I was an adult. I was 31 or 32. I chose to play the character.” “When I read the script I understood it could’ve been controversial and difficult,” the actor later added, noting that she never had any reservations about taking on the role. “I did say to David, ‘You don’t have to say the lines, but I would like to rehearse with you all the scenes and paraphrase the lines.’ I wanted to make sure that what you’re seeing is a person who has maybe a kind of Stockholm syndrome, and we rehearsed for a full day. I felt reassured that what I saw in the character, the way I wanted to play, he had agreed.” “I’m glad ‘Blue Velvet’ was directed by David Lynch,” Rossellini told IndieWire. “It’s one of his best films. He’s such a great author. I think my character was the first time we did an abused woman, a portrait of an abused woman, but also she camouflaged herself behind what she was asked to be, which was sexy and beautiful and singing, and she obeys the order, and is also victimized it. That’s the complexity of ‘Blue Velvet’ but also the great talent of David Lynch. I thought he did a fantastic film. I love ‘Blue Velvet.’”

Love em, but they were royally wrong on this one!

Another one where Siskel wins over Ebert. This happened rarely but gotta go with Gene on this one. Blue Velvet was a very entertaining thriller with great performances and writing all around.

The fat one complains about adolescent dialogue and then has a reaction like that. Jaysus.

All movies have "cliches". The big audience poll gave this movie an "A". Self-proclaimed critics' opinions mean nothing, mainly because their criteria are different, hypocritical, and contradicting.

The big pollster shows an "A" rating from actual moviegoers, so they disagree with the self-proclaimed critics.

Maybe Ebert would've felt better if there was a short onscreen note before the film starts: No actor was harmed while making this film. I'm with Gene's take on the film.

South park if you saw the episode ruined this film for me lol

I loved this movie!!!!

This is a great movie what the hell is up with these two.

Newman goes on to win an Oscar in this movie. They must have been shocked..

Mr. Newman's performance was one of the best acting job's EVER. One of my all time favorite movies.

Isabel Rosseli is someone I’ve never heard of before this picture. I liked it. Genes right as usual,

David Lynch has become my favorite producer and everything in pictures.

Siskel and Ebert: Its sad so it sucks.

siskel is right when he tells ebert that lynch 'got him'.

Some give Ebert flack for this review. I love that it's basically a document of a well respected and famous movie critic trying (and failing) to make sense of Lynch's style.

Two clowns.

Then why is it a comedy? This line symbolizes why Ebert doesn’t get it

Their opinion has never meant anything to me.

Roger Ebert let his own sensibilities interfere with his viewing of this classic. Strange, as he gave a thumbs up to David Cronenberg's CRA$H a gew years later

I finally understand where Ebert is coming from for I have seen Poor Things. I admire Ebert for being honest and upfront about how the movie affected him, even if it was a bad review in a sea of praise.

Glad that Isabella Rossellini finally weighed in on this matter to state the obvious: that she was an actress playing a role. Common Dwebert L

SISKEL LIKED FROM BEYOND BETTER THAN ALIENS lol

Ebert: “If a director wants to play me like a piano he’d better get me some music worth listening to.” Lynch: “Okay.”

These two jokes were always missing the mark on these types of movies. They were clowns

So, they liked THIS and they didn’t like the Thing? Loved these guys, but they were so inconsistent in their likes and dislikes as to be maddening.

Gotta love Ebert regardless of the direction he puts his thumbs , hes still got a very interesting point of view regardless ❤

I like this movie but.. I get it. I get where they're coming from.

Clarence Williams was so scary in this

Horrible damned film. Sweet Jesus. Even the best get it wrong sometimes.

Ironic that movie was great and the review was boring, wrong, poorly cast with nagging characters. It just missed the mark with me, don't waste your time. Effin critics, never could stand these two stiffs.

Ebert got schooled haha

I love Roger Ebert but he doesn’t know what he’s talking about here.

Kids movies can have emotional and dark scenes and it's not bad!

Ebert, dude? YOu don't think Rosselini saw a script???

It's strange to me that the co-writer of "Beyond The Valley of the Dolls" rails against camp

Love this movie. Never understood why film snobs and critics loathed it so.